![]() Uli Plank wrote:Stick to FCP-X, it's better for that camera. Not all of us can afford to go out and buy a new camera just to run a piece of software. To me, not being able to handle XAVC natively and perfectly is a pretty major issue. ![]() ![]() I am hoping I didn't jump into DR too soon. Trying the whole "generate optimized file" thing now, but I do long format stuff.3-4 cameras, 90 minutes of running footage each.tying up twice the hard drive space and spending hours generating the files may be my only chance to using DR in my workflow. ![]() Well, DR loads the files an plays them.but with all the stuttering I am experiencing, it makes them unusable for professional editing. I just bought studio, lured by the fact that it "supports" XAVC h264.where as free does not.looking to get out from under Adobe's terrible "pay forever" plans. Premiere has been doing it for years now. No excuse for them to not be handled well. That's all well and good to say.but the fact of the matter is that that format, as well as XAVC, are widely used by professionals for varying reasons. Tero Ahlfors wrote:AVCHD is a bad format and it needs to die.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |